[NTG-context] registers: setting pageleft parameter by index term

Hello list, please consider this MWE: \definenumber[p] \setnumber[p][1] \def\PageLeft{ p.~} \def\TextCommand#1{\getnumber[p] #1\doif{\rawcountervalue[p]}{2}{\def\PageLeft{ P.~}}\incrementnumber[p]} \setupindex[n=1,pageleft=\PageLeft,pageright=,textcommand=\TextCommand] \starttext Foo\index{foo

Re: [NTG-context] index entries printed over each other

to avoid it? >> >> Sorry, no MWE yet, probably hard to reproduce... >> >> Latest, i.e. yesterday’s beta with LuaTeX; the same with the previous >> version. > This can be a problem with the columns mechanism. You can try to disable > balancing w

Re: [NTG-context] index entries printed over each other

with LuaTeX; the same with the previous version. This can be a problem with the columns mechanism. You can try to disable balancing with \setupindex[balance=no] or disable columns for the index and flush the content within a columns environment. \startmixedcolumns %[grid=no] \placeindex[n=1

[NTG-context] Registers with distinguishable entries.

the same: textstyle regular, pagestyle slanted. Moreover, in \setupindex (or whatever other name for the register), [indicator=no] is ignored. Are these bugs or am I doing things the wrong way? I add a (not so) minimal example. Thanks in advance for any help. Robert Blackstone

Re: [NTG-context] style= in \placeindex

at combining them (using different ways of grouping) failed. Thanks, Jörg \setupindex[color=red,alternative=A] Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg

Re: [NTG-context] style= in \placeindex

(or \setupregister), but all my attempts at combining them (using different ways of grouping) failed. Thanks, Jörg \setupindex[color=red,alternative=A] Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Bug / feature request tracking

. I have the following, in my PhD thesis \setupindex[pagestyle=normal] \setupregister[index][def][pagestyle=bold] \def\indexdefinition#1{\index[def::]{#1}} \def\defterm#1{\leavevmode{\indexdefinition{#1}\it#1}} \def\deftermx#1#2{\leavevmode{\processcommalist[#2]\indexdefinition\it#1}} \def\useterm

Re: Re[2]: [NTG-context] Bug / feature request tracking

in the register. That would be immensely useful to produce a structured index. I have the following, in my PhD thesis \setupindex[pagestyle=normal] \setupregister[index][def][pagestyle=bold] \def\indexdefinition#1{\index[def::]{#1}} \def\defterm#1{\leavevmode{\indexdefinition{#1}\it#1}} \def\deftermx#1

Re: [NTG-context] \setupregister - \setupindex

Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: I just noticed that \setupindex is not exactly the same as \setupregister[index]; indeed, \setupindex does not allow the syntax \setupindex[form][options=values] whereas \setupregister[index][form][options=values] is valid. yeh, \setupindex is a generated command

[NTG-context] \setupregister - \setupindex

I just noticed that \setupindex is not exactly the same as \setupregister[index]; indeed, \setupindex does not allow the syntax \setupindex[form][options=values] whereas \setupregister[index][form][options=values] is valid. -- Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta